Two Buck Chuck - Not Terrible
A few years ago, my doctor told me I needed to get my cholesterol down. Well, I haven't done a whole lot in that direction over the course of two years. Since I'm currently in the diet and exercise mode, I decided to try some "alternative treatment".
Red wine.
You see, I'm not much of a wine drinker. Okay, I'm *NOT* a wine drinker. I haven't drank more than a few sips of wine since my days in college at Western Michigan University, when $5 would get you 3 bottles of Boones Farm white zin. *shudder* And I didn't do that unless I was REALLY REALLY desperate, which was almost never.
Tonight, on a trip to Trader Joe's, If you haven't heard of Trader Joe's, click the link. It's sort of a cheap hippie food mart. Lots of organic and natural products - at prices more affordable than you'd find in your local whole foods store. Near the front of the store, they had a wine display, and cases upon cases of Charles Shaw wine. Every time I've been into Trader Joe's, I've seen people leaving with cases of this stuff.
It's $2.99 a bottle here in North Carolina. Apparently, this is the famed "Two Buck Chuck".
If I'm going to drink red wine for the sole purpose of lower my cholesterol, I don't want it to be an expensive habit. So I picked up a bottle of the Cabernet - a 2003 vintage.
I'll have to ask my wife, but it's pretty drinkable. I can probably deal with a glass a day of this stuff.
Not that Adrienne would be much more of a real opinion. She likes wine, but she'll drink just about anything. I think her favorite wine is a Chilean wine whose bottle is wrapped in burlap, and only costs $8.99 a bottle. That's probably the most expensive wine she usually gets.
Anyway... anyone out there have any opinions on Two Buck Chuck?
You are not logged in, so your subscription status for this entry is unknown. You can login or register here.